wip These pages are work in progress. Please add comments if you want. If you have material to submit send them to me via admin@wmsurgeons.com

Search:     Advanced search
Browse by category:
Contact Us

Symptomatic gallstones and a dilated CBD

Author:Lengyel J.
on 13 Dec, 2007

Last edited by: Lengyel J. on 13 Dec, 2007
Add comment
Views: 968
Votes: 0
Comments: 0
Symptomatic gallstones and a dilated CBD
 
What would you do with a patient who has symptomatic gallstones in the form of an acute admission with cholecystitis, and an USS that shows a dilated CBD with calculi?
 
There are probably 4 approaches to management of CBD stones
 
1) ERCP versus open surgical bile duct clearance.
2) Pre-operative ERCP versus laparoscopic bile duct clearance.
3) Post-operative ERCP versus laparoscopic bile duct clearance.
4) ERCP versus laparoscopic bile duct clearance in patients with previous cholecystectomy.
 
Which option would you chose? You should be aware of the evidence.
 
  1. In the era of open cholecystectomy, open bile duct surgery was superior to ERCP in achieving CBD stone clearance ( Cochrane 2006)
  2. In the laparoscopic era, thers is no significant difference between laparoscopic and ERCP clearance of CBD stones. Using ERCP however means more procedures per patient. ( Cochrane 2006)
  3. If you clear the duct with ERCP is there a need then to remove the gallbladder?
 
 
Also see the following links:
 
  

Pre- or post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct clearance in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones offers no apparent advantage over surgical exploration

 

Between 10% to 18% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones have common bile duct stones. Treatment options for these stones include pre- or post-operative endoscopy (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), open surgery, or laparoscopic bile duct exploration. In the era of open cholecystectomy, open bile duct surgery was significantly superior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in achieving common bile duct stone clearance. A trend towards decreased mortality was also surprisingly seen in the surgical arm. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with simultaneous laparoscopic bile duct exploration seem to be as safe and as efficient as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and avoid an extra procedure.
Incidence of Bile Duct Stones in Cholecystectomy Patients
About half of bile duct stones found in patients with normal preoperative abdominal ultrasound are either false-positive or pass spontaneously.
Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) identifies bile duct stones (BDS) that were not predicted by preoperative imaging in as many as 10% of patients, but only 2% to 3% of these patients develop symptoms. Therefore, it is likely that some stones identified during IOC are actually air bubbles (false-positive studies), spontaneously passed out of the biliary tree, or that persist without causing symptoms. To examine the incidence and natural history of such stones, researchers in Ireland prospectively evaluated 999 patients with symptomatic gallstones who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC; none had jaundice, biliary dilation, or BDS on abdominal ultrasound. In patients with filling defects identified on IOC, a fine-bore cholangiogram catheter was left in the cystic duct for repeat cholangiography at 48 hours and 6 weeks.
IOC was successful in 962 patients (96%). Of 46 patients (4.8%) with filling defects on IOC, 12 (26%) had normal cholangiograms at 48 hours (classified as false-positive IOC), and 12 (26%) had normal cholangiograms at 6 weeks (spontaneous stone passage). No patient developed complications from stone passage, and only 2 patients reported a single episode of pain. Twenty of the remaining 22 patients with filling defects had their stones removed endoscopically. The other 2 patients were managed expectantly and remained asymptomatic at 5 years.
Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of BDS was significantly correlated with elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and patient age, but neither factor predicted spontaneous stone passage. Similarly, the diameter of the bile duct, number of stones, and size of the stone did not predict spontaneous passage of stones.
Comment: Bile duct stones occur in 3.5% of patients with normal preoperative abdominal ultrasound, but about half of these patients either have false-positive IOCs or pass the stones spontaneously. Thus, 50% of patients would undergo unnecessary invasive interventions based on IOC findings alone. An alternative strategy is expectant management (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound performed at 6 weeks and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for identified stones). Because IOC did not influence management in more than 95% of patients, selective IOC may be more appropriate than routine IOC.
— Stuart Sherman, MD
Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology February 18, 2004
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Others in this Category
document What is Helicobacter Pylori and how do you test for it?
document What are the prognostic indicators of pancreatitis?
document Glasgow system for pancreatitis
document Barretts oesophagus
document how would you manage an upper GI bleed in a patient with ascities and known liver disease?
document Upper GI Bleed.
document Where would you find cacinoid andf how would you classify it?
document Staging of Oesophageal cancer ( TNM)
document Do you need to take the Gallbladder out after bile duct clearance?
document What are the risks of ERCP?



RSS